home  Logo

POINTS TO PONDER
WHEN MAKING A WILL

The following is based on an extract from Nick Renton's
Learn More Retirement Planning:

ARE FREE WILLS REALLY FREE?

Some organisations are willing to draw up wills free of cost to the testator. These organisations include:

  • statutory trustee companies, as long as they are named either as the sole executor or as a co-executor and they have reasonable prospects of getting fees on corpus (capital) and income in due course when administering the deceased estate - see further below
  • charities, as long as they are named as beneficiaries of the estate.

    However, it should be noted that a seemingly "free" will can become very expensive indeed for the beneficiaries if five per cent or thereabouts of the total value of a large estate has to be paid away to a trustee company, especially if relatively little work needs to be done in order to wind up the estate.

    The effective cost can be even larger if the only way to pay such a commission requires the disposal of an asset such as a family farm which would otherwise have been retained intact.

    Of course, there is nothing to stop a testator from varying such a free will later on (apart from the moral obligation incurred by the process).

    The precise scale of charges should be ascertained before using a trustee company, particularly in the case of relatively simple estates.

    TRUSTEE COMPANIES

    There are a relatively small number of statutory trustee companies operating in Australia. These companies are usually old-established, conservative institutions, with large staffs and vast funds under management.

    They advertise themselves as being very experienced in trustee and investment work and as being able to provide an ongoing service without the problems of individual executors dying or just being unavailable.

    However, notwithstanding their credentials overall, in recent years several statutory trustee companies have got into serious financial trouble and have had to be wound up by the courts.

    The fees charged by statutory trustee companies could involve some or all of:

  • an initial commission based on a percentage of the capital value of the fund
  • a periodical commission based on a percentage of the income of the fund
  • an administrative fee for each debit or credit entry
  • an hourly fee for any paperwork

    or some variation of that.

    CONSUMER COMPLAINTS

    Beneficiaries under estates administered by statutory trustee companies sometimes express great dissatisfaction with the arrangements.

    Typically, such complaints can relate to:

  • the time taken to wind up the estate and distribute the beneficiary entitlements
  • the relatively high level of their fees
  • allegedly poor investment performance
  • the conversion of assets into cash when they could have been retained in their original state
  • in the case of an ongoing administration, bureaucratic delays and red tape in providing money required by beneficiaries for personal expenditure items authorised by the will
  • the thoughtless loss or destruction of items of great sentimental value (such as old photographs or letters) even though these may have had no commercial value.

    Because of such problems some testators prefer to use joint executors, namely, a statutory trustee company and a relative. The former is chosen because of its permanent existence and its resources to look after the bookkeeping and taxation aspects. The latter is chosen to provide a more human touch.

    CHARITABLE TRUSTS

    Some trustee companies encourage their wealthier clients to set up charitable or philanthropic trusts. They offer facilities to assist this process and to handle the ongoing administration - but they regard this activity as a profit centre and charge fees accordingly, thus reducing the value of the gift.


  • Back to the top of this Page

    Compendium of Good Writing

    The Gravy Train: More on Fees

    Home Page of Nick Renton AM

    This page http://users.bigpond.net.au/renton/932.htm was last updated on 2005-05-25