|
CHAPTER 16
WOMEN
IN (ancient) IRELAND
By
all the laws of nature the entire Irish race should be extinct. So what
preserved them through the centuries of oppression, through the degradation,
debasement, humiliation? It was largely through the strength of character of
Irish womanhood! The ever-resurgent desire to escape from bondage was fostered
through the female line and passed from mother to son. Patrick Pearce knew the
truth of it when he wrote the moving poem for his mother:
There
were many other stirring poets, Emily Lawless, Ethna Carbery (1865—1911), to
name but two of the better known. Maire Ni Dhubh, the grandmother of Dan
O’Connell, ‘The Liberator’ was a poet of exceptional gift, and there is
nothing finer in any literature than the wonderful ‘Lament’ composed by her
daughter ‘Dark Eighlin,’ for her murdered husband, Art O’Leary. In
Ireland, from the remotest time of which we have any record, historical or
legendary, women stood emancipated, and were eligible for the professions, and
for rank and fame. In the dimmest, most ancient legends, casual references to
druidesses, poetesses, women physicians and women sages, prove that in the very
remote days, in which these legends were created, there was nothing uncommon or
surprising in women filling these positions. In the oldest of all invocations in
Irish legendary lore, Amergin, praying to the gods for safe landing says: ‘Let
the learned wives of Breas and Buaigne pray that we may reach the noble woman,
great Eirinn’. The
ancient Irish had a goddess, Bridget (or Brigid), who represented poetry and
wisdom — and they also had a mortal Bridget (450—525) who was a famous
lawgiver. In the fifth century she commanded respect, reverence, and moral
obedience. Her laws and sayings were instanced, and her decisions followed as
precedents by her learned successors, well down into historical times. She was
the first, and only, female Christian bishop. The various Lives of Bridget describe her ordination as a bishop and, although
some are clearly uncomfortable with it, none deny it. Bridget, who founded a
great religious house in Kildare, with her followers, enjoyed enormous power in
the early Irish church. Her power derived from elements of Celtic heritage still
in the Irish Church, which revered the sacredness of the ‘Mother Goddess’.
St Bridget is venerated all over the world. In England there are 19 places
dedicated to her, including the oldest place of Christian worship in London, St
Bride’s in Fleet Street. Ancient
Ireland was a matriarchal society, and women were then on equality with men.
Particularly great women compelled an admission of superiority too. In the eyes
of the law this dictum is laid down concerning marriage, ‘To his wife belongs
the right to be consulted on every subject’. Before a Brehon’s court husband
and wife stood on equal terms and although the law held that the man had
headship in the marriage union, it established that a man did not own his wife.
‘It is only contract that is between them,’ stated the law. In
Ireland, after marriage, the woman did not become a chattel — thus radically
differing from the custom in the other countries in Europe. Before marriage she
was wooed and courted like the superior being which later she was acknowledged
to be in all countries. In the exercise of the acknowledged privileges of a
superior being she could scorn and frown down the attentions of chieftains and
scholars — and kings too — send them home with hanging heads, and choose
whomever her heart went out to. And after marriage she was not — as
unfortunately was generally the case elsewhere — the property of her husband.
In the eyes of the law, they were partners in a matrimonial venture. So
far in front was the Irish law that under it the wife could remain sole owner of
property that had been her own before marriage. Also, the property that was
jointly owned by them could not be sold or signed away by the husband. Their
rights in the joint property were equal; and the voluntary consent of both was
necessary for its disposal. This
is a remarkable acknowledgement of the equality of women in the remotest days,
above all in equality persisting after marriage, when, down to recent days, even
in highly advanced countries, all such rights were ascribed to the husband. A
married woman retained the right, too, in her person to pursue a case at law,
and in her own identity to recover a debt. That
the schools were open to women is shown by a hundred references in the old
records. Women attended the school of St Finian at Clonard, in the sixth
century. When the daughter of the King of Cualann came to the school, to learn
the psalms, Finian put the girl in the companionship of his favourite pupil,
Ciaran, with whom she read them. The Bible was read in Latin at those schools so
it follows that women studied the classical languages then. In
the various centuries and in the various generations some of the more ambitious
women sought and obtained the highest education (around twenty-one years of
study) at least from the days of Patrick downward. Through all the centuries
some of them acquired fame in this area, just as they did in other lines of what
we today might have imagined the people of that time would have considered
man’s endeavour. Ireland’s first woman martyr to be canonised was St
Grimonia of Soissons, who was martyred near Soissons, in France in the 4th
century, before the time of St Patrick. There
is in the Book of Ballymote a sort of
history in prose and verse of Eireann’s famous women down to the time of the
English invasion. Their achievements are indeed remarkable. By
reason of their equality with men in other realms, women warriors frequently
felt it their duty to take up arms and march into battle with their brothers or
husbands. It was only in 697 that they were exempted from warfare. Because
of the primary importance of military duty, and the necessity of having men
liable therefore, if a daughter inherited the land she had to provide and pay a
warrior when a military levy was made. It is said that it was the famous
law-wise Bridget, who, about the time of Christ, gave the legal decision that
granted this right (to inherit land) to women. There
were certain cases of legal separation — for legal separation for good cause
then existed[1]
— in which it was adjudged the right of the wife to take with her all the
marriage portion and the marriage gifts, and an amount more than that for
damages. The
old laws as well as the old stories everywhere testify that Irish women of
ancient days devoted much attention to dress, toilet and the general care and
adornment of the person. The care of the hair was the most elaborate of all.
Constant time and attention were given to combing and dressing the hair. The
oldest illuminated manuscripts reflect this. It was beautifully curled in spiral
curls; both in front and hanging down the side. It was braided down the back,
and confined at the end with golden rings, or with light, hollow golden balls. Many
of their ancient ornaments and their beautiful toilet arrangements are still
preserved. Very beautiful wrought brooches of silver, and gold and bronze; great
pins for the hair and pins for the cloak; leather handbags with embossed
patterns for carrying their personal ornaments; veils and gloves; beautiful
combs; mirrors too, may be seen in the museum of the Royal Irish Academy and in
the National Museum. There were scented oils for toilet use also. The
men as well as the women regularly indulged in — the bath. The ancient
warriors, the Fenians, bathed every evening before they took their great meal.
It was considered a shameful breach of hospitality if a bath was not at once
prepared for the traveller or the stranger in the house that they honoured by
their presence. Chivalrous
respect for women, both the married and the unmarried, was a characteristic
feature of Irish life in all ages. The authentic chivalry of true men was shown
to them, not at all the artificial gallantry which in later days in other
countries was the base counterfeit substituted for the real thing. True
courtesy, respect and honour were accorded the women, every time and everywhere.
In the chief homes and palaces, always the women had their special wing of the
house exclusively reserved for them. It was known as the Grianan, signifying the
sunny part. Women
of ancient Ireland were sensible of the fact that they were man’s equal, and
where necessary could insist upon equal treatment. A very fine case of this is
related in the Book of Lismore of
Cathair the Pious. She (Cathair) was a holy woman who lived the life of a hermit
in the days when Saint Senan had a monastery on the Island of Inish-Cathaig. He
forbade women to come upon the island. The Book says that Cathair, praying one
night, saw in a vision all the churches of Ireland sending up towers of fire to
heaven. But the greatest of the great fire towers went up from Inish-Cathaig.
‘Tither will I go that my resurrection may be near it’, exclaimed Cathair.
But Senan, meeting her on her arrival on the shore, commanded her: ‘Go to thy
sister on yon island east, for guesting. No women shall enter here.’ To which
the indignant Cathair, fired for her sex and her rights, answered: ‘How canst
thou say that? Christ is no worse than thou. Christ came to redeem women no less
than men. No less did he suffer for the sake of women.... No less than men do
women enter the heavenly kingdom. Why then shouldst thou not take women to thee
in thine Island?’ And
this able pleader won over the Saint, and for once shattered his rigid rule. In
the fifteenth century there was Mairgret O’Carroll, princess of Offaly. ‘She
was the woman’, says the Annalists, ‘that made the most of repairing the
highways and creating bridges, churches and Mass books, and of all manner of
things profitable to serve God and her soul, and, while the world stands, her
many gifts to the Irish and Scottish nations shall never be numbered’. In
statecraft and in peace making she was equally distinguished. Like all Irish
women of noble repute, she led the men folk so surely and so unobtrusively that
they believed they went forward of their own free will. When she announced her
intention of visiting the shrine of St James of Campostella in Spain a big
gathering of warriors, hardened war-dogs, led by MacGeoghagan, wished to
accompany her (1445). They went together. Her
daughter Finola — ‘the most beautiful and stately, the most renowned and
illustrious of her time, her own mother alone excepted,’ — married
O’Donnell, Lord of Tir-Chonnail. When O’Neill, aided by MacDonnell, invaded
her territory, she ‘after the fashion of the strong-hearted and independent
women of Ireland, met them at Inishowen, and made peace without leave from
O’Donnell. Finola, after the death of O’Donnell in an English prison,
married the golden-haired Hugh O’Neill, ‘who was thought to be King of
Ireland’, ‘the most renowned, hospitable and valorous of the princes of his
time’. He died in 1444. Three years later Finola, ‘renouncing all worldly
vanity, betook herself into the devout life on the monastery of Killeigh; and
the blessing of guests and strangers, the poor and the rich, and both of the
poet-philosophers and archi-poet-philosophers be on her in that life’. It
is beyond the scope of this short history to delve into the lives of individual
women. However, it is relevant to briefly mention three uncommon Protestant
women of the twentieth century who left their mark on the shaping of the Irish nation.
Maud
Gonne (1865—1953), a famous actress and beauty, and the unrequited love of the
poet William Butler Yeats was a feminist decades before her time. She was born
in Aldershot, England but her father, who was of Irish descent, was posted to
Dublin in 1882. While recuperating in France from tuberculosis, she was
influenced by Lucian Millevoye who advised her to act on her sympathies for the
cause of Irish freedom. She spent the 1890s touring France, England, Scotland
and America, promoting the cause and collecting funds. Back in Dublin she
founded the revolutionary woman’s movement ‘Inghinidhe na hEireann’
(Daughters of Ireland). She was a staunch republican and reformist and married
an Irish soldier, John McBride, who died before a British firing squad for his
part in the Easter Rising of 1916. She was arrested in Dublin in 1918 and
imprisoned in Holloway prison for six months. Their son, Sean, was one of the
founder members of Amnesty International and a recipient of the Nobel Peace
Prize. Maude
Gonne McBride captured some of the disillusionment of Irish patriots, and some
of the vision and heartache of all the Irish people, when she wrote ‘It was
then that I saw her, Cathleen Ni Houlihan [Ireland] in all her beauty, her dark
hair blowing in the wind, going towards the hills, springing from stone to
stone, over the treacherous surface of the bog. The gleaming white stones before
her marked her path and faded into the darkness. I heard a voice say “you are
one of those little stones on which the feet of the Queen rest a moment on her
way to freedom.” Then the sadness of the night and loneliness overwhelmed me
and I wept. Now old and not triumphant, I know the blessedness of having been
one of those little stones on the path to freedom.’ An
interjection here will demonstrate how the influence of the British press
(Australian newspapers reprinted articles from The Times verbatim) or British journalists permeated the lives of
Australians then. (Not that much has changed![2]
The events of the Easter Rising received extensive coverage in the Australian
press. It was grossly overestimated that the rebel force numbered 12,000 of
which 2,000 belonged to the Citizen Army. (There were in fact 1,300 volunteers
and 200 of Connolly’s Citizens Army.) The reports also repeatedly show an
attempt to paint the Republicans as cowardly, looters, and devoid of humanity,
such as their alleged firing on ‘elderly and unarmed reservists’, whilst
amazingly an Irish girl ‘caught in a hail of sniper’s bullets’ dragged 200
British soldiers to safety! No need to comment on that one! From
the Courier, 1 May 1916: Countess
Constance Markievicz, ‘attired in male clothing of semi-military cut’, with
two service revolvers strapped to her belt, led her men in the attack. A
Melbournite caught in the Shelbourne Hotel (Dublin) recounted that ‘she
deliberately shot six of her men who refused to obey her commands
immediately’. Again,
comment would surely spoil it. Lady Gregory, Isabella Augusta Persse (1852—1933),
born in County Galway, was raised in the Protestant landed gentry tradition. She
studied the Irish language and Irish folklore and was a life-long friend of the
poet W.B. Yeats. Her house at Coole Park became a meeting place for writers of
the Literary Revival. She was a playwright and a benefactor of poets and
playwrights. She crystallised many of the Irish aspirations and with Yeats she
founded the Abbey Theatre, where many of the Irish playwrights work was
performed. She wrote 27 plays in all, mostly sympathetic observations of Irish
rural life highlighting the negative results of British corruption and
mismanagement in Ireland. The ideas and dialogue of many of Yeats’ plays are
attributed to her. It
was this respect for women, permeating society in every age in Ireland, that
gave such moral fibre to the Irish race as enabled it not only to persist
through later long and fearful centuries of oppression unparalleled, under which
other races would have disappeared — not only to persist through these
terrors, but to come out of them still morally stronger that almost any other of
the most favoured peoples of Europe. God and Bridget blessed the race that
blessed the name of Woman. It
is ironic that women were more liberated and more emancipated two thousand years
ago in pagan Ireland than they were ever again to be in almost any of the
civilised nations of the world. Good cause might be, failure to provide for the
family, being absent for too long, cruelty, being no good in bed [2]Editorial Courier Mail, Saturday, 4 February 1995. `But at the same time, the road to the future lies forward'. How profound! `Large numbers of Irish people...understand this imperative and desire to be part of the modern world rather that remain hostages to history...The criminal gunmen of Ireland...represent no one but themselves. Mr. Major's initiative deserves to succeed.' At a time when Major was the only one without initiatives and
an editorial in the British Independent had this to say: `Why dig in their
heels over the IRA's refusal to start handing over arms, when even the
police and the army say that this is an issue of no importance? ... The
government has cause to be thankful that the discipline that made the IRA
such a formidable enemy has also enabled its leaders to deliver a complete
cessation of violence.' |
|