History
, Philosophy and Arts of the Ancient and Modern World
"Wisdom begins
in wonder." (Socrates)
The
Philosopher - The lover of Wisdom.
Since
the days of first recorded history there have been men and women who have done
more then live celebrated lives of heroism in battle or invention. There have been the
thinkers who pondered the questions of who we are, our reason for being, our relationship to
the universe, what is the best way to live upon the earth and what happens when
we die. Imhotep, who built the first pyramid is perhaps the first man to record
such thoughts and today we all associate ourselves with some form of
philosophy, whether we realise it or not.
Following
the migration from Egypt soon after the time of Akhenaton, Moses
laid down the Ten Commandments which was and is one of the great foundations upon which
Western civilization still rests. However, if one looks into the older Egyptian
writings one finds similar guides to what is good and what is forbidden. (see
the Book of the Dead on Death page under Egypt section) No
philosophy, idea or religion exists in isolation. If such a thing as
Divine intervention exists it is surely governed by the laws of nature.
The gradual development of thought, just as with he evolution of nature, is
a system of trial and error governed by the physical
world of needs and surroundings and has a solid foundation built upon what has
come before. Unfortunately not
all thought has been good and over time, some ideas have been left wanting.
Philosophy is a theory, a map, a guess and hence may not always lead in the
right direction. No one can ever be sure he is correct, though many claim that
right with undeserved certainty. It is up to us to learn what we can, use what we know, refine
what others have given us and in the end we will come to our own decisions. A
conscience must be informed and that is our greatest responsibility. We can
only maintain an open and enquiring mind and do our best.
From
the beginning we have sought wisdom from the 'Tree
of Knowledge',
but do not be deceived, because knowledge alone
does not bring wisdom or as is said "A
little knowledge can be a dangerous thing"
There
appears to have been times in history when little progress has been made. In what
we in the West call the dark ages Europe appears to have been a dismal and
uninspired place, but in the Arab world intellectual thought flourished,
Universities shone and much progress in philosophy and science was made. There
were however times in various parts of our world when progress did cease and
intellectual thought did indeed go backwards, but thankfully there were also times when an
enormous explosion of
great thought occurred such as around 500 BC.
around 500
BCE
The
Axial age - a
flowering in man's history and development.
Zoroaster
630 - 553 BCE
(Persia)
preached the contest between good and evil and one supreme being.
Lao
Zi from
604 BCE
- (China)
taught the acceptance of the laws of the universe and founded Daoism.
Thales
of Miletus
624-546 BCE
speculated
about the primary material element of all beings and cosmic phenomena.
Buddha
560 - 480 BCE
(India)
found enlightenment.
Confucius551-479 BCE
(China)
the
ethical philosopher, taught mutual respect.
Isaiah
II (Israel)
around this time Judaism finally came to see God as being the unique, one and
only.
Socrates
469 - 399 BCE
(Greece)
taught how to think and by that would virtue be achieved.
Plato
427-347
BCE
(Greece) recorded
Socrates wisdom and discussed the whole range of philosophical topics.
At
that time the 'father of history', Herodotus
(Greece)
485 - 425 BCE
was the first
to write history and observations with critical analysis under the influence of philosophical thought and
research.
Also
the
oracle at Delphi came to great prominence, Jerusalem was destroyed and the
population exiled in Babylon, as great shifts in population occurred throughout
Asia Minor. This time also saw such figures asPythagoras,
Sappho, Nebuchadnezzar, Euripides, Sophocles, Aeschylus, Hippocrates, Democritus.
The
things that will destroy us are:
politics without principle;
pleasure without conscience;
wealth without work;
knowledge without character;
business without morality;
science without humanity,
and worship without sacrifice.
Mahatma Ghandi
'The
thought manifests as the word; The word manifests as the deed; The deed develops
into habit; And habit hardens into character. So watch the thought and its ways
with care, and let it spring from love born out of concern for all
beings.'
The
Buddha
This
quote has taken on new meaning in my existence as the dilemma of concern
reverberates through my life. Concern for the well being of others has responsibilities
and dangers. One is, in my belief, obliged to consider the welfare of others. It
is not necessary to seek out each member of our family of man, but when
opportunity or fate presents itself, are we obliged to become involved and to
what extent and with what commitment? Each of us are ultimately responsible for
our own life and the actions we take. However upbringing, knowledge, emotional
constraints, poverty, confusion, disappointment, loneliness, war and many things
can weigh down on our ability to understand ourselves and the world around us.
At times it is almost as if we have no control because of what life has given
us. Not all can settle their mind sufficiently to take the time to objectively
contemplate what is good for ourselves or the world in general. The mind can be
so occupied with survival, both mentally and physically, that rationality
becomes confused. If you are ducking a bullet or starving or alone or frightened
it is difficult to sit back and gather the bravery, discipline and strength to
stop and contemplate justice and morality. Such things have had to be ingrained
in times of less stress so that like a reserve of energy they can be referred to
or called upon with ease and without struggle. One needs to be simply able to
open the book at times and not have to write it. Therefore when someone is in
need and we have the book, but they do not, is it a requirement that we show
them the book, or even make them read it. How can we be sure that what we see as
the need is correct. If we have truly spent much time in contemplation we are
still not entitled to believe that we have the source of truth and
understanding. We do however have the right and obligation to be concerned for
those we love and those who are simply our neighbour. What ever the cause or
reason that such concern is aroused, the question remains as to how far we go
and for how long we attempt to assist or relieve. If we privately commit to help
is it a failure to give up, is it a disgrace to fail, is it an obligation to
continue? When all seems lost is it time to re-examine our thoughts that may be
renewed in manifested deeds and thus eventually habits which realign our
character so that love will make concern second nature.
I
guess we just try.
Is
leadership nothing more than an unavoidable temptation for power or is a
politician a philosopher? Today I would suggest that few give such effort to the
propositions and decisions they thrust upon us. Like parenthood, politics is one
of the most important jobs existing as it influences the lives of all, but it
also requires no training, no certificate of expertise and is thus considered
democratic. A politician may bring to office, economic knowledge, a propensity
for showing toughness or sadly in some cases, little realisation of their own
limitations, but seldom a philosophical approach to what is the essential good.
An idea motivated by expediency, greed, a desire for popularity or power is not
a wise suggestion. Too often a bias becomes the first principle, ill informed
and ignorant of the failures of such things in the past, but we do repeat
ourselves and how often a whole society can be hurt by such laziness. Perhaps we
are only human and as some say, with a predisposition to sin, to do bad, to think
only of ourselves. We bit the apple to know good and evil, but can we understand
the difference and choose? It takes courage to challenge an easy thought, a
protective bias or self absorption. To look at the whole, to admit a
mistake, to change our mind; these take effort, education and a willingness to
submerge the ego. To me, a wise idea respects both the greater good and the good
of the individual, the disciplined freedom of each of us and respects the earth
upon which we all depend. After all, our descendents will not have the time to
contemplate the great mysteries in a world destroyed. Harmony, truth, justice,
knowledge - Ma'at, is
the goal. An optimist will say that no matter what evil befalls us, good will
triumph eventually, but as life goes both up and down a pessimist might feel that
good too often fails and soon descends into evil. It all depends on how you wish
to think, for both are true in the cycle of life. We must stand tall and upright before ourselves and all that exists.
"He who
merely knows right principles is not equal to him who loves them." (Confucius)
'The
Consolations of Philosophy'by
Alain De Botton
A
book that shows philosophy to be a great aid for everyday problems by revealing
practical wisdom in the writings of some of the greatest thinkers of all time.
The book is in six sections ; 1. unpopularity from Socrates, 2. not having
enough money from Epicurus, 3. frustration from Seneca, 4. inadequacy from
Montaigne, 5. a broken heart from Schopenhauer, 6. Nietzsche: "Not
everything which makes us feel better is good for us." A top book that
makes you us feel better in a good way, full of modern relevance, humour and
wisdom. As is mentioned if it isn't easy to read and doesn't make you happier,
throw it away. But I guarantee you won't.
"Accuse
not nature, she hath done her part;
Do thou but thine, and be not diffident
Of wisdom, she deserts thee not, if thou
Dismiss not her, when most thou needest her nigh,
By attributing overmuch to things
Less excellent, as thou thyself perceivest."
John Milton, Paradise Lost
"Do
not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand" Spinoza
Philosophers
Not
always correct and not always good, but philosophy is the search for wisdom which, although
it does not always lead to sustainable truth, at least provokes discussion
and thought. If we do not test ideas we may as well have none.
Rubens
'The Four Philosophers'
Peter
Paul Rubens stands behind a group seated below a bust of the Roman philosopher,
tragedian and statesman Seneca (4BC-65AD). In the group is
his much admired brother Philip, who died a couple of years before in 1611 and
was one of the great Classicists of his age. Beside him are his teacher, the
scholar Justus Lipsius, and another top student Jan Woverius.
Francis
Bacon 1st Viscount St Alban, BaronVerulam (1561 - 1626)
The English Lawyer, scientist, essayist and philosopher and 'Father of Modern
Science' was born in London,
educated at Cambridge, was briefly a diplomat and served in Parliament from 1584
to 1617. His father and he served under Elizabeth 1 and he progressed during the rule
of James 1. He became Attorney General in 1613 and Lord Chancellor in 1618 but
subsequently charged with bribery and corruption, imprisoned and then banished
from court. He wrote on truth, adversity, death and the method for how knowledge
is advanced. He tabulated affinities and deviations and by this he thought to
define scientific understanding, but this proved to be of little use further
down the line. He strongly supported the use of experimentation and not mere
scholastic methods to understand nature. His works include 'Novum Organum' 1620
and the literary works 'The Advancement of Learning' 1605, 'The New Atlantis'
1626. Bacon did not marry until the age of forty-eight and was by preference
homosexual. He had "ganymedes and favourites" The Puritan moralist Sir
Simonds D'Eweswrote about Bacon's
love for his "very effeminate-faced" servants. Bacon's relationships
followed the pattern of patron/favourite. More specifically, he had a preference
for young Welsh serving-men. He also wrote poetry and plays, and there is still
controversy that he co-authored many of Shakespeare's plays, including Hamlet.
Bacon was one of the first Englishmen to write an essay on the nature of beauty,
and his models were "August Caesar, Titus Vespasianus, Philip Le Bel of
France, Edward IV of England, Alcibiades of Athens, and Ismael of Persia who
were the most beautiful men of their times"
"Read
not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to
find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider." Bacon
Rene
Descartes (1596 - 1650) The
French Philosopher, Mathematician and Scientist was born in La Haye. He was
schooled by Jesuits and was absorbed by the certainty of mathematics. From 1628
he lived in Holland for twenty years until he was invited to Sweden by Queen
Christina, but he died a few months after his arrival in Stockholm. The
Cartesian method began with undoubted premises from which rationalism and logic
would describe the universe. The sole premise he could not doubt, was that he
was a thinking substance "cognito ergo sum - I think, therefore I am."
From there he established the existence of other substances, the universe and
god. Spirit and matter were bound completely and hence one could not be
influenced without the intervention of god. Animals he regarded as animated
machines and open to free exploitation. Obsessed with mathematics he believed
that science could proceed by mere deduction but did some experimentation. As a
strict Catholic, after Galileo was condemned, he withdrew an early work
supporting Copernicus' theory of the universe. His great works were 'Discourse
de la Methode' (1637) and 'Meditations de priuma philosophia' (1641) and
'Principia philosophiae' (1644)
Benedict
de Spinoza (1632 - 1677).
The Dutch Philosopher was born in Amsterdam of Jewish parents. His education was
traditional but his observance lapsed and he was expelled in 1656. He studied
Latin and absorbed Western Culture. He wrote a version of Descartes 'Principles
of Philosophy' in 1663 and his own 'Thological Political Treatise' in 1670 and
'Ethics' published in 1677. He believed that human passions must be obedient to
the state and that substance had attributes but was not such itself The infinite
possessor of attributes he identified with nature and god ( the two being the
same and also an impersonal definition of God) The mind of man was part of that
nature and thus lacked the ability for free will, Realisation of this oneness
with nature/god was man's highest goal. His early days were spent as a glass
grinder and the dust particles led to his death from lung disease. His ideas
caused a ruckus but
"Be not astonished
at new ideas; for it is well known to you that a thing does not therefore
cease to be true because it is not accepted by many."
George
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770 - 1931) The
German philosopher was born in Stuttgart, studied theology and later became
professor of philosophy in Berlin. Much which followed his ideas were influenced
by or in opposition to his Hegelianism To Hegel the spirit, either human or more
all encompassing, is the true reality. The spirit or mind follows passes through
strict logical stages of which a collision of opposed ideas is essential to gain
a synthesis and attainment of greater knowledge. He believed that this dialectic
operation dealt with reality and was the true aim of philosophy as opposed to
observational analysis of the sciences and everyday activity. Marx took
this dialectic turned it around and applied it to history which he saw as a
clash of contradictory social systems.
"Whatever
is reasonable is true, and whatever is true is reasonable."
"We learn from
history that we do not learn from history."
Arthur
Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)
The German metaphysical philosopher was born in Danzig, and became a lecturer in
Berlin in 1820, gained little acceptance until old age and spent his final
thirty years in isolation at Frankfurt am Main. His major work was 'The World as
Will and Idea'. To Schopenhauer 'will' was the great reality, an active
principle, a blind impulse which encompassed gravity or motivation. The 'idea'
referred to, he saw simply as an image received without intellectual intuition
by the brain. He was influenced by Eastern philosophy and the existence of
human suffering. Sometimes his thought was referred to as the philosophy of
pessimism. Sympathy and in particular asceticism were seen as paramount to bring
subjugation of the will and allow the intellect to see beyond the veil of
illusion.
"Compassion is the
basis of all morality."
"A man can do
what he wants, but not want what he wants."
"We forfeit
three-fourths of ourselves in order to be like other people."
Frederich
Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844
- 1900). The German
Philosopher was born in Rocken, the son of a pastor. He began his studies in
Bonn and Leipzig and became a professor at Basle University even before
graduation. Joining the military during the Franco-Prussian War he developed an
illness which eventually led to insanity at the end of his life. He dedicated
his first work 'The Birth of Tragedy' to Wagner whose influence and and that of
Schopenhaur led him early on to develop the idea of the 'superman' by stating
that it is not the movement of masses that is historically significant but the
deeds of the great. Although he despised nationalism and racialism, his ideas
such as democracy being no more than a mechanism by which mediocre quantity
prevails over quality, were claimed as justification by the nationalists (Nazis)
and socialists. Symbolically he described the last 2000 years of history as
primarily a conflict between Rome and Judea or the hero and the mild slave. His
sister who was his nurse and biographer once belonged to a failed Arian colony
and became an early follower of Hitler.
Bertrand
Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (1872 - 1970)
(
(left) The English philosopher and mathematician was born in Wales, studied
mathematics at Trinity College Cambridge. In Collaboration with Alfred
North Whitehead (1861 - 1947)
(right)he wrote
'Principia Mathematica' in an attempt to show that the truths of mathematics can
be derived from the basic truths of logic. Russell went to jail in 1918-1919 for
sedition and again in 1961. Disillusioned with Communism he wrote 'The Practice
and Theory of Bolshevism'. He was not a Christian, supported women's
suffrage, sexual freedom including homosexual law reform, established his
own progressive school, married four times and had many affairs, was sacked for
lectures on sexuality, campaigned for Nuclear Disarmament and won the Nobel
Prize for Literature in 1950. He also wrote the popular 'A History of Western
Philosophy'. He also developed Wittgenstein as a protege but had very little in
common.
Ludwig
Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889 - 1951) (left)
The Austrian philosopher was
born in Vienna of a Jewish family who had become Catholic in the 1830's. He was
a student at the Linz Realschule the same time as Hitler. He went on to do
engineering at Manchester University and then Mathematics at Cambridge where he
worked with Bertrand Russell. After serving in the Austrian army in WW1 he
became a naturalised Britain in 1938 and then professor of philosophy at
Cambridge. His earlier work 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus' argued that
language is a series of propositions that picture simple understandable facts.
Later he rejected this in favour of language having many functions which overlap
without a common character. He believed that philosophy should attempt to clear
up problems that have arisen because of linguistic and other confusions. Much
of 'Tractatus' was
modelled after Otto
Weininger's (1880–1903)(right)
mystical philosophy of logic from 'Sex and Character.' ashamed
of being gay, feeling that it made them like women, whom they believed to be
inferior. They also saw Jews as an effeminate race and both were anti-Semitic
although both were of Jewish descent.
Frederich
Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844 -
1900). The German Philosopher was born in Rocken, the son of a pastor. He
began his studies in Bonn and Leipzig and became a professor at Basle University
even before graduation. Joining the military during the Franco-Prussian War he
developed an illness which eventually led to insanity at the end of his life. He
dedicated his first work 'The Birth of Tragedy' to Wagner whose influence and
and that of Schopenhaur led him early on to develop the idea of the 'superman'
by stating that it is not the movement of masses that is historically
significant but the deeds of the great. Although he despised nationalism and
racialism, his ideas such as democracy being no more than a mechanism by which
mediocre quantity prevails over quality, were claimed as justification by the
nationalists (Nazis) and socialists. Symbolically he described the last 2000
years of history as primarily a conflict between Rome and Judea or the hero and
the mild slave. His sister who was his nurse and biographer once belonged to a
failed Arian colony and became an early follower of Hitler.
Bertrand
Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell (1872 - 1970) ( (left)
The English philosopher and mathematician was born in Wales, studied mathematics
at Trinity College Cambridge. In Collaboration with Alfred
North Whitehead (1861 - 1947)
(right)he wrote
'Principia Mathematica' in an attempt to show that the truths of mathematics can
be derived from the basic truths of logic. Russell went to jail in 1918-1919 for
sedition and again in 1961. Disillusioned with Communism he wrote 'The Practice
and Theory of Bolshevism'. He was not a Christian, supported women's
suffrage, sexual freedom including homosexual law reform, established his
own progressive school, married four times and had many affairs, was sacked for
lectures on sexuality, campaigned for Nuclear Disarmament and won the Nobel
Prize for Literature in 1950. He also wrote the popular 'A History of Western
Philosophy'. He also developed Wittgenstein as a protege but had very little in
common.
Ludwig
Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889 - 1951) (left)
The Austrian philosopher was
born in Vienna of a Jewish family who had become Catholic in the 1830's. He was
a student at the Linz Realschule the same time as Hitler. He went on to do
engineering at Manchester University and then Mathematics at Cambridge where he
worked with Bertrand Russell. After serving in the Austrian army in WW1 he
became a naturalised Britain in 1938 and then professor of philosophy at
Cambridge. His earlier work 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus' argued that
language is a series of propositions that picture simple understandable facts.
Later he rejected this in favour of language having many functions which overlap
without a common character. He believed that philosophy should attempt to clear
up problems that have arisen because of linguistic and other confusions. Much
of 'Tractatus' was
modelled after Otto
Weininger's (1880–1903)(right)
mystical philosophy of logic from 'Sex and Character.' ashamed
of being gay, feeling that it made them like women, whom they believed to be
inferior. They also saw Jews as an effeminate race and both were anti-Semitic
although both were of Jewish descent.
Auguste
Isidore Marle Franciois Comte (1798 - 1857)
French philosopher and mathematician. He was a lecturer at the Ecole
Polytechnique from 1833 until his retirement in 1851,due to bouts of
insanity. After a long illness he eventually died of cancer. He taught that
mankind and the individual passes through intellectual phases of the
theological and the Positive ( a hope for the future). His important wark
was 'The Course of Positive Philosophy'. He was an extreme humanist and
believed in Logical Positivism, i.e. that nothing could be learned beyond
the physical, human knowledge is relative and not absolute and morality
should be sought in the perfection of humanity by scientific means and not
by recourse to an unknowable god. He was eventually excommunicated from the
Roman Catholic Church. Originally committed to observation and
experimentation, in his later years he became involved in mysticism, to the
point where Positivism became more of a religion, than anything else.